My Town vs Your Town: Competition or Collaboration?

Pattern Festival 2024:

The shape of place and culture

For our latest Patn Sprint meetup we looked at competition and collaboration — between towns, cities and regions.

24 March 2024

Why is this a vital issue? Regional leaders and policymakers recognise the potential for collaborating with other regions to improve people's lives in the North of England.

Why is this a vital issue? Regional leaders and policymakers recognise the potential for collaborating with other regions to improve people's lives in the North of England.

A recent example is the joint Liverpool-Manchester vision of a Northern Arc rail link to support economic growth. And at the recent Convention of the North, held in Preston, there was plenty of talk and advocacy of cross-regional cooperation.

However, competition is embedded in the current system, and culture, for bidding for grant money. Furthermore, rivalries between places run deep, some going back centuries.

So, how do the different pieces of the puzzle fit, when considering collaboration as a tool to drive transformation?

Pros and cons of localism

Politically, localism is all about control — who wields it, who wants it and what they can do with it when they get it. The politics of localism have real-world consequences. The idea behind English regional devolution is it will enable regions to improve how they deliver policies to improve the economy and people's lives.

With the establishment of metro mayors, devolution is a work in progress. And whereas Greater Manchester’s 10 boroughs, via the GMCA, have established how they should work together, applying this model in Lancashire, say, is likely to be more complex.

Currently, conspicuous disparities in economic opportunity and performance exist within regions. Then there are very different local characteristics to consider.

These local identities tend to be stronger than regional identities and reflect a deep sense of allegiance. Proponents of devolution must somehow reconcile deep-seated local interests with what's best for a wider region.

Taking a hyper-local approach

Taking a hyper-local approach

Hyper-localism looks to align specific local placemaking needs with strategic approaches and policies. The question persists: what if there’s a clash between the natural insularity of local areas or neighbourhoods and the wider strategic vision of a devolved regional area?

However, we can view places from different perspectives simultaneously, inward and outward, and reconcile the different priorities of local identity and location. An example is Stockport.

In recent history, its advantages have been framed in terms of its immediate access to Manchester and London (via the East Coast Mainline) – ie outward-facing. But more recently, Stockport has created a sense of being an inward destination, where locals and visitors can enjoy what the town offers.

In this context, hyper-localism amplifies a location's inherent benefits alongside its wider regional, and even national, context.

Equality vs fairness

Equality vs fairness

The other inherent quality of hyper-localism is its recognition that one size won’t fit all — it adapts to the specificity of each location. This is a crucial aspect when considering the different needs of areas or towns within a devolved region — what works for one place may not work for another.

There's unlikely to be a level playing field. Therefore, the task of policymakers and placemakers is to look carefully at each case and listen attentively and actively to local needs.


This approach prioritises fairness as a principle, rather than equality, which, realistically, is much harder, if not impossible, to achieve.

It's also a case of managing expectations — not every town or locality can become a magnet for visitors or a thriving centre of local enterprise. Plus, a place's current conditions can determine how far its residents are willing to go to transform it. Failing towns may have a greater appetite for risk because they feel they have little to lose by trying something different.

Collaboration and competition

Competitiveness is hard to avoid because it arises from need. Also, traditionally the government has favoured it when inviting bids for funding because it sees competition as driving quality and innovation.

Competition is rule-bound, whereas collaboration thrives on accountability — a quality central to engaging with local communities to uncover what makes them tick and what they want.


Developing a collective vision for a region helps instigate change at a macro level. But, delivering change realistically and impactfully happens at a hyper-local level.

There’s a lot for placemakers to unravel here. Striking that essential balance between broad strategic intent and connecting at a hyper-local level will determine future success in helping the North thrive.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Find us

Patn Studio


x+why


Embankment East Tower Cathedral Approach
Salford M3 7FB

Subscribe to our newsletter

Find us

Patn Studio


x+why


Embankment East Tower Cathedral Approach
Salford M3 7FB

Subscribe to our newsletter

Find us

Patn Studio


x+why


Embankment East Tower Cathedral Approach
Salford M3 7FB

Subscribe to our newsletter

Find us

Patn Studio


x+why


Embankment East Tower Cathedral Approach
Salford M3 7FB

Patn is a registered trademark of Partisan Studio Ltd. © 2025